Is It Worth Getting A Manuscript Assessment

Gary Smailes
Gary Smailes | 3 February 2026
Is It Worth getting a manuscript assessment

What a Manuscript Assessment Is (and Isn’t)

A manuscript assessment is a professional, big-picture critique of your manuscript. Think of it as an editor stepping back, reading the whole book the way a smart, picky reader would, then writing you a report on what works, what wobbles, and what to tackle first.

You do not get a book back covered in tracked changes. You get perspective. You get diagnosis. And if the editor is any good, you get a clear set of priorities, so you stop rewriting chapter three for the ninth time while the real problem sits in the middle like a dead plant no one wants to talk about.

Most assessments arrive as an editorial report, often with page references and examples. Some editors add light in-manuscript notes, but the main deliverable is the report. The goal is simple: help you revise with intent instead of hope.

What an assessment looks at

A good assessment reads your novel the way an experienced editor reads in-house, with a pen hovering over the big levers.

Story structure. Does the story build in a shape readers recognise for your genre, even if you bend the rules? Do events escalate, or do they circle? Are there long stretches where nothing forces change? An editor might point out, for example, that your inciting incident lands on page 80, which explains why your beta readers keep “getting busy” around chapter four.

Pacing. This is not about speed. It’s about pressure. Are scenes doing work, or are they hanging out? Do high-tension moments get undercut by long explanations? Do quiet scenes still move something forward, like a relationship, a plan, a threat? In an assessment, you’ll often see notes like: “The first third repeats the same problem without raising the cost,” or “Chapters 12–14 feel like setup for a twist we already understand.”

Character development. Do your characters want something concrete, and do they pursue it in ways that make sense? Do their choices create consequences, or do things happen to them? Are motivations clear on the page, not in your head? You might hear, “I understand what she’s doing, I don’t understand why,” which is editor-speak for: you have the pieces, but the emotional logic is missing on the page.

Plot logic and causality. Does one event lead to the next, or do scenes feel like a series of episodes? Are there coincidences doing heavy lifting? Are reveals earned? Editors love asking annoying questions like, “Why doesn’t he call the police here?” Not because they want your book to turn into a public safety pamphlet, but because plot holes often show up as characters failing to take the obvious action.

Voice and narrative distance. Voice is what makes your pages feel like yours. An assessment will look at whether that voice stays steady, whether it suits the story, and whether the point of view is under control. If your narration swings from intimate to distant, or your tone shifts from witty to grim with no warning, readers notice. They might not explain it well, but they stop.

Market positioning and genre fit. This part matters more than writers like to admit. If you’re writing a romance, the reader expects the relationship arc to be central and satisfying. If you’re writing a thriller, the engine needs to start early and keep throwing complications. An assessment should tell you when the book you wrote is fighting the shelf you want to put it on.

Reader engagement. This is the editor asking, page by page, “What makes me turn the page?” Stakes. Questions. Tension between characters. A sense of motion. If your opening leans on atmosphere and reflection, the editor might suggest a shift toward action or decision so the reader has something to grab.

A strong assessment does not drown you in every possible issue. It picks the handful that will make the biggest difference. Fixing commas is pointless if the middle sags. Polishing sentences is wasted money if the protagonist has no goal.

What a manuscript assessment does not do

This part saves people a lot of disappointment.

A manuscript assessment is not a line edit. You won’t get sentence-by-sentence rewrites. You won’t get a corrected manuscript where every repetition is trimmed and every clunky paragraph is reworked. You also won’t get full correction of grammar, punctuation, spelling, or consistency. That’s a different service, and it takes a different kind of time.

Here’s a quick way to frame the difference:

If you hire an assessor and expect line-level cleanup, you will feel cheated. If you hire a copyeditor when the book has structural problems, you will feel polished and stuck at the same time.

Also, an assessment is not coaching. Some editors offer follow-up calls, but the assessment itself is a report, not a long collaborative process. You’re paying for insight and a plan, not weekly hand-holding.

Where it sits in the editing process

In the editing food chain, the assessment sits early. Think of it as triage.

You finish a draft. You have a sense it works in places and fails in others. You might have beta feedback, but it’s messy or contradictory. This is the moment for an assessment.

It tells you what kind of editing you need next, if any.

And here’s the quiet benefit: an assessment can save you from “fixing” the wrong thing for months. Writers love to rewrite chapter one because chapter one is familiar. Editors look for the chapter that breaks the book, then point at it without flinching.

If you want one sentence to hold onto, make it this: a manuscript assessment tells you what to fix first, and what to stop fussing over until later.

When a Manuscript Assessment Is Most Worthwhile

A manuscript assessment pays off when you are at a crossroads. You have a full draft. You know the book has life in it. You also know you are one enthusiastic rewrite away from making a mess of something you cannot yet name.

This is the moment where professional distance matters. You are too close to the work to see the shape of it. An editor is not. They read your manuscript as a whole, then tell you where the story holds, where it sags, and where you are spending pages without getting much return.

Here are the situations where an assessment tends to earn its keep.

You’ve finished a complete draft and want direction before investing months in rewrites

Writers often start revising the way people start reorganising a kitchen drawer. You pick a spot, you fuss, you feel productive, and three hours later you have achieved new levels of neatness without fixing dinner.

An assessment stops the drawer-sorting.

If you have a full draft, you are holding a rough map. The question is what kind of trip it is. Do you need to reroute the whole journey, or do you need better signposts?

A good report will tell you things like:

Notice what none of those are. They are not “replace this verb” notes. They are “stop repainting the walls, the foundation is cracked” notes. If you get those early, you save months.

A quick self-check: if you are about to commit to a big rewrite, and you cannot say what you are fixing in one clear sentence, pause and get outside eyes. Otherwise you risk rewriting the same book with different furniture.

You’re stuck because you sense something isn’t working, but you can’t name it

This is the classic. You have feedback from friends. You have feedback from beta readers. One person says it’s slow. Another says they love the slow parts. Someone else says your protagonist is “unlikeable” but cannot say why. You try to address all of it. You end up addressing none of it.

“Something isn’t working” usually comes down to a few predictable culprits.

Structure problems. The story starts too late, or too early. The turning points are soft. The middle is a long walk with no new obstacles. Scenes do not build.

Stakes problems. The protagonist wants something, but the cost of failure is vague. Or the cost is huge, but the character does not behave as if it is.

Point of view problems. The narration sits too far from the character, or it jumps heads in a way that blurs tension. Or the chosen viewpoint character is not the one driving the story.

Theme problems. The book circles an idea but never commits to it. The story feels busy, yet oddly empty.

Genre fit problems. You think you wrote a thriller, but the first real threat arrives halfway through. You think you wrote a romance, but the relationship is treated like a subplot. Readers do not mind rule-breaking. They mind being sold one experience and given another.

An assessment is built for naming the problem. Once you can name it, you can fix it. Until then, you will revise in the dark, guided by vibes and panic.

Try this mini-exercise before you book, because it will also help your editor: write down the three moments where you, the author, felt bored or unsure while drafting. Not the reader. You. Those moments often point straight at the real issue.

You plan to query agents or submit to publishers, and you need your manuscript to compete

Traditional publishing is crowded. Agents read fast. Editors read faster. Your book does not need to be perfect, but it needs to feel controlled. It needs to show you understand story.

A manuscript assessment helps you reach “professionally ready” in the ways agents tend to care about:

You are not paying for praise. You are paying for the hard truth before an agent delivers it with less context and a form rejection.

Another benefit: market positioning. A good editor will flag issues like word count for genre, audience confusion, or mismatched expectations. If your adult fantasy reads like YA in voice and stakes, you want to know. If your memoir’s strongest angle is not the one you are leading with, you want to know.

This is also where an assessment can protect your confidence. Rejections sting less when you know the manuscript has been stress-tested, and you have fixed the issues within your control.

You’re self-publishing and you want an editorial roadmap before paying for deeper edits

Self-publishing puts you in charge. Great. It also means you pay for every stage. So the question becomes: where does your money do the most work?

An assessment is often the best first paid step because it tells you what you are dealing with before you book the expensive stuff.

If the report identifies structural problems, you revise first. Then you pay for line editing once the story is stable. Otherwise you risk paying someone to polish chapters you later delete. Editors love being paid, but even we think that is a painful way to spend your budget.

Think of the typical sequence like this:

  1. Assessment or developmental feedback to sort the big issues
  2. Developmental edit if you want deeper collaboration on structure and execution
  3. Line or copyedit for prose, clarity, consistency
  4. Proofreading for final errors

If you are self-publishing on a timeline, the roadmap matters even more. An assessment helps you estimate the scope of revision. Are you looking at a trim and a sharpen, or a rebuild?

One practical tip: if you want to publish in three months and the assessment suggests a major restructure, you have learned something important. The schedule needs to change, or the goal needs to change. Better to know early than to throw a cover on a story that still has holes.

You want a professional perspective on audience and genre expectations

Friends and beta readers read as themselves. An editor reads as readers. Plural.

They pay attention to patterns across the market. They notice when your opening resembles a common setup, and when you fail to add a fresh angle. They spot when you are writing to an audience you are not fully serving.

This is where comps, length, and positioning come in. If you tell an editor, “I see this alongside X and Y,” they can tell you whether the book on the page lives near those titles, or whether it is drifting into a different neighbourhood.

This is also where an assessment can be a relief. You do not have to guess whether your book is too long for debut crime, or whether your cosy mystery has too much on-page violence for the readership. You get a clear answer, plus options.

A small warning, delivered with affection: do not ask an assessment to validate your dream reader. Ask it to identify your real reader. Those are not always the same person.

A quick gut-check before you spend the money

A manuscript assessment is most worthwhile when you are ready to revise and willing to hear notes you did not expect.

If you want reassurance, call a friend. If you want a plan, call an editor.

What You’ll Get for Your Money (Deliverables and Quality Markers)

When writers ask what they get with a manuscript assessment, they often mean, “What shows up in my inbox?” Fair question. You are paying for time, judgement, and a clean read from someone who has no emotional attachment to your characters. The output should reflect that.

A good assessment does two jobs.

First, it tells you what the manuscript is doing now. On the page. In the reader’s head.

Second, it tells you what to do next, in an order that makes sense. Not a grab bag of notes. A plan.

Common deliverables (and what they should look like)

Most assessments arrive in a few parts. The mix varies by editor, but the bones tend to be the same.

Editorial report with actionable notes

This is the main event. An editorial report is usually a multi-page document, often somewhere in the 5 to 20 page range, longer for long manuscripts or deeper services.

Length matters less than usefulness. I have seen ten pages of sharp, specific guidance outperform thirty pages of vague pep talks and writing book quotes.

A strong report often includes:

You should come away able to answer, “What are the main problems?” and “What should I tackle first on draft two?”

If you finish reading the report and your only thought is “Well, that’s interesting,” something went wrong. You want “Ouch,” followed by “Okay, I know what to do.”

Chapter-by-chapter comments or scene-level breakdown

Some editors include an outline-style pass through the manuscript. Sometimes it’s chapter notes. Sometimes it’s scene notes. Sometimes it’s a beat sheet.

This is where you get feedback like:

If your story feels mushy, this breakdown is gold. It turns “pacing issues” into “these three scenes are doing the same job” or “your turning point arrives forty pages late.”

If the editor does not include this level of detail, ask what you will get instead. Some reports stay high-level by design. That’s fine, as long as the report still points to specific places in your manuscript. You need coordinates, not philosophy.

Strengths and risks summary plus a clear revision plan

Look for a section that reads like a triage note. What are the strengths to protect, and what are the risks to address?

A useful strengths list is not “your voice is nice.” It’s more like:

A useful risks list is not “watch pacing.” It’s more like:

Then comes the revision plan. This is where your money earns interest.

The plan should give you an order of operations. For example:

  1. Clarify the protagonist’s goal and stakes in the first three chapters.
  2. Rebuild the middle plot spine around three escalating obstacles.
  3. Rework the ending so the final decision grows from earlier choices.
  4. Only then, address line-level tightening in revised scenes.

If the plan is “revise pacing and deepen character,” push for specifics. How. Where. In what order.

Signs of a strong assessment (quality markers)

You do not need to be an editor to judge editorial feedback. You need to look for evidence. Here’s what evidence looks like.

Specific examples from your manuscript

Generic advice is cheap. Specific advice requires reading, thinking, and returning to the page.

You want notes anchored to moments in the book:

Even better if the editor quotes short lines or references key scenes. Not to nitpick your prose, but to show they are dealing with your actual manuscript, not an imaginary version of it.

If you could swap your name with another writer’s and the report would still make sense, you paid for a template.

Prioritised issues (top 3–5 fixes that move the needle)

A manuscript has a hundred things you could improve. An assessment earns its fee by telling you which five matter first.

Good prioritising sounds like:

Bad prioritising sounds like a list of twenty equal-weight problems. That is overwhelming and, frankly, lazy.

You should feel slightly annoyed at the priorities. Not because they are wrong, but because they are hard. That’s a sign the editor is dealing in real leverage.

Practical next steps

You are not paying for diagnosis alone. You are paying for a route out of the swamp.

Practical next steps look like:

One of the best lines an editor can write is, “Do not change X.” Writers underestimate how much damage comes from unnecessary tinkering.

Questions to ask before booking (so you don’t buy the wrong service)

Editors use overlapping terms. Writers use them loosely. Misunderstandings happen. Ask a few direct questions and you avoid disappointment on both sides.

What level of feedback do you provide?

Use plain language. Ask:

If you want deep, collaborative restructuring, say so. Some assessments are designed as a broad overview. Others lean closer to a developmental edit. Neither is “better.” One fits your needs. One does not.

Will you comment on market fit, genre conventions, and reader expectations?

If your goal involves agents, publishers, or selling to readers, market fit matters.

Ask whether the editor will address:

You are not asking the editor to predict sales. You are asking them to spot mismatches before readers do.

Do you offer follow-up Q&A or a call?

A report often raises questions. Sometimes you need ten minutes to clarify one sentence. Sometimes you need an hour to talk through options.

Ask:

This matters because the value of an assessment often lands in the second read. First read is emotional. Second read is where you turn the notes into a revision checklist. That’s when questions show up.

One last piece of blunt advice: before you book, ask for a sample report or an anonymised excerpt. You are not snooping. You are checking fit. Editors have voices. So do you. You want yours to survive the process, while the weak parts of the manuscript do not.

Costs, Alternatives, and How to Decide

Money talk makes writers squirm. I get it. You did not start a novel because you love spreadsheets.

Still, if you are thinking about a manuscript assessment, you are already in business mode. You are weighing time, cash, and your own tolerance for wandering in circles on draft three.

So let's make the decision less mystical.

What drives the cost (and what you are paying for)

Prices vary for the boring reason most prices vary. Time and skill.

Here are the main factors.

Manuscript length.
An 80,000-word novel takes longer to read and diagnose than a 45,000-word novella. A 120,000-word epic takes longer still. Editors price by word count, page count, or standard manuscript pages for a reason. Reading is work. Reading like an editor is more work.

Turnaround time.
If you want feedback next week, you are asking an editor to reshuffle their schedule. That costs more. Fast slots are fewer. Editors protect them.

A good rule: if you are racing a submission deadline, pay for speed. If you are not, take the normal schedule and keep your money for later edits.

Editor experience.
You are not paying for someone to spot problems. Most competent readers spot problems. You are paying for someone to name the real problem, not the symptom, and to suggest fixes that do not break the book.

An experienced editor often writes a shorter report with more impact. They have seen your issue in thirty other manuscripts, with thirty different disguises. They do not panic. They diagnose.

Depth of analysis.
Two services may both be called "assessment" and be nothing alike.

One is a high-level read with broad notes and a revision plan. Another includes a scene-by-scene breakdown, market positioning, and a call. More depth equals more time equals higher price.

Before you compare rates, compare what you are receiving. A cheap assessment that leaves you confused is expensive.

When a manuscript assessment is not the best spend

A manuscript assessment is great at one thing: helping you make smart revision decisions. If you are not in a revision-ready place, you will not get full value.

Here are the common mismatches.

You are still drafting

If you are halfway through the book, a big-picture report often becomes a moving target. You will change the second half, then the feedback no longer fits, then you feel stuck again.

If you need momentum to finish, do not buy an assessment to avoid drafting. Finish the draft first. Even a messy draft. Especially a messy draft.

If you are desperate for guidance mid-draft, consider a smaller check-in on your outline, first three chapters, or synopsis. Cheaper, focused, and less likely to send you into a full rewrite before you have an ending.

You mainly need sentence-level polish

If the story is solid and your problem is clunky prose, an assessment will frustrate you. You will get notes about structure and stakes, and you will think, "Yes, yes, but what about my paragraphs?"

That is a different service.

If you are already happy with the story and you want the writing to read clean, skip the assessment and put the money into the right edit.

You have not used beta readers or critique partners yet

Paying an editor before you have any reader feedback is like hiring an architect before you have checked whether the land floods.

Beta readers will not replace an editor, but they are good at answering basic questions:

If three beta readers trip over the same section, you have a clear revision target. That is valuable, and it costs far less than professional feedback.

Use the cheaper tools first. Then pay for the professional eye when you have squeezed the obvious problems out.

Alternatives that work well before or alongside an assessment

A manuscript assessment is one tool. Often, you get better results by pairing tools in the right order.

Beta readers with a tight brief

Do not send your book to beta readers with "Tell me what you think." You will get "I liked it" and one comment about a typo. Nice, useless.

Instead, send a short questionnaire. Keep it focused. For example:

  1. At what point did you feel invested, and what caused it?
  2. Where did you skim, and why?
  3. What do you think the protagonist wants, in one sentence?
  4. What felt implausible or unearned?
  5. Which scenes would you cut?

You are not looking for solutions. You are looking for patterns.

Writing groups and critique swaps (structured, or don't bother)

A good writing group is not a social club with snacks. It is a small team with rules.

Use structure. Ask for feedback on a specific element. Provide the same kind of feedback in return. Set a page limit. Set a deadline. Rotate who gets the deep critique.

If your group spends thirty minutes arguing about whether first-person present tense is "allowed," run.

A paid sample critique of the first 10 to 30 pages

This is an underused option, and I love it.

A sample critique does three things:

A sample critique also protects you from the worst outcome: spending a large fee and realising you hate how the editor communicates. Editorial fit matters. You need to trust the voice in your ear for the next few months.

One caution. A sample of the opening pages will not diagnose your whole structure. It will diagnose your entry into the story, your setup, your voice, and your early promises to the reader. Still worth it, especially if you suspect the opening is your weak spot.

How to decide: a simple framework that works

Writers love to overthink. Editors love to simplify. Let's do the second one.

Ask yourself three questions.

1) Do you know what is wrong, or are you guessing?
If you are guessing, you need diagnosis and direction. That points to a manuscript assessment.

If you already know the problem, you might not need an assessment. You might need help executing the fix.

2) Do you want a roadmap, or a partner in restructuring?
A manuscript assessment gives you a roadmap. You do the driving.

A developmental edit is closer to co-piloting. More back-and-forth. More detail. More time. More cost.

If you want someone to help you rebuild the book with you, budget

How to Get the Most Value From a Manuscript Assessment

A manuscript assessment is a diagnostic. Treat it like one.

If you hand the editor a half-organised draft with no context, you will still get useful feedback, but you will leave value on the table. If you prepare well, you get sharper notes, fewer misunderstandings, and a report you can turn into a practical plan instead of a document you reread while sighing.

Prepare the manuscript and your brief

Editors read words, but we also read intent. Your brief tells us what you meant to write, who you wrote it for, and what success looks like for you.

Give the editor enough to aim their attention.

1) Name the genre and the target reader.
Be specific. "Fantasy" is a continent. "Adult romantic fantasy with political intrigue" is a postcode.

If you are unsure, say so. Something like: "I think this is adult suspense, but I keep getting feedback that it reads like a thriller." That helps an editor look for genre signals and mismatches.

2) Offer two or three comparable titles.
Not your favourite books. Books that sit near yours on a shelf today.

A useful set of comps looks like this:

If comps make you sweat, keep it simple. Pick books published in the last five years that share readers with your book.

3) Tell the truth about what you are worried about.
Do not play cool. If you fear the middle drags, say so. If you suspect your protagonist is passive, say so. If you have rewritten the first three chapters twelve times and you hate them now, definitely say so.

A strong brief has three parts:

Here's a template you can steal:

Now the editor can test those exact points.

4) Share your publishing route and timeline.
Traditional querying and self-publishing ask different questions.

If you plan to query agents, market fit and opening pages matter a lot. Agents often decide fast. The assessment should pay attention to your first 30 pages, your hook, and your genre promises.

If you plan to self-publish, you may care more about series potential, reader satisfaction, and how the book will land with your specific niche. Timeline matters too. If you want to publish in six months, the revision plan needs to be realistic.

5) Submit the cleanest draft you can manage.
This does not mean perfect prose. It means readable.

Do a quick pass for the obvious distractions. Remove placeholder notes to yourself. Fix character names that change halfway through. Make sure chapters are in order. If the editor has to fight the document, part of your fee goes toward wrestling, not reading.

One more quiet tip. If you know you have two versions of the opening, pick one. Do not send both and ask the editor to choose. Make the best call you can, then get feedback on the version you believe in.

Use the report effectively (without spiralling)

When the assessment arrives, your brain will do a fun little trick. You will focus on the line that stings and ignore the four pages of helpful guidance.

Do this instead.

Read the report once. No notes.
Sit on your hands if you must. The first read is for understanding, not problem-solving. You are getting a lot of information, and you want the shape of it before you start arguing with individual points.

If you feel defensive, take a break and come back. Defensive is normal. Defensive is also noisy.

Read it a second time and build a revision checklist.
Now you get practical.

Open a fresh document and create three sections:

Most writers reverse this. They start with "nice to fix" because it feels safe. Then they spend a month polishing sentences in a chapter they later cut. Do not do that to yourself.

Look for priorities, not volume.
A good report may feel long. Your job is to find the handful of changes that move the book the most.

Ask these questions:

When you find a root problem, circle it. Root problems are gold because one fix solves five complaints.

Example: an editor writes, "The protagonist's goal stays vague until chapter six." Underneath that you often find pacing problems, weak stakes, and scenes that feel like filler. Clarify the goal early and the whole book tightens.

Fix structure before style.
If scenes are out of order, if the climax does not pay off, if the character arc is fuzzy, sentence polish is wasted effort.

There is a clean order for revision:

  1. Story spine: premise, goal, stakes, turning points, ending
  2. Scene work: causality, motivation, tension, setup and payoff
  3. Character: desire, agency, change, relationships
  4. Prose: voice consistency, clarity, line-level rhythm
  5. Copyedit and proofread, later

If you do it in that order, each pass becomes easier. If you do it backwards, every "fix" creates new mess.

Draft the changes, do not patch them.
Writers love working in the margins because it feels controlled. It also creates Franken-drafts.

If the report suggests significant changes, start a new draft file and rewrite forward with the new decisions in place. You will move faster than you think because you stop negotiating with old sentences.

Try this mini-exercise. Pick one major recommendation, such as "raise the stakes in act two." Write one page describing how act two changes if the stakes are higher. No fancy prose. Bullets are fine. Then rewrite a test scene under the new conditions. You are proving the change before you rebuild the whole book.

Track improvement like a professional

Revision gets messy when you rely on vibes. Professionals use tools.

You do not need special software. You need a few simple documents.

Make a scene list.
A scene list is a table or bullet list of every scene, in order. For each one, write:

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a manuscript assessment and how is it different from a line edit?

A manuscript assessment is a big‑picture editorial diagnosis that explains what works, what does not, and which fixes will move the book the most. It focuses on story structure, pacing, character arcs, plot logic and market fit rather than sentence‑level polish.

By contrast, a line edit or copyedit deals with prose, clarity, consistency and grammar. If you are asking "what a manuscript assessment includes" expect an editorial report, chapter or scene notes and a revision plan, not tracked changes on every paragraph.

When is the right time to get a manuscript assessment?

Get an assessment after you have finished a complete draft and you suspect something is off but you cannot name it, or before you invest months in rewrites. It is also the right step if you plan to query agents or self‑publish and want a professional check on market positioning.

Avoid buying one while you are still drafting; if you need momentum to finish, use critique partners or a focused outline review first. The assessment is most valuable when you are revision‑ready and willing to act on strategic notes.

What will I actually get — the manuscript assessment deliverables?

Typical deliverables are a multi‑page editorial report with actionable notes, a chapter‑by‑chapter or scene breakdown, a strengths and risks summary, and a clear revision plan prioritising the top fixes. Some editors include light in‑manuscript comments and a short follow‑up Q&A or call.

Quality deliverables include specific examples from your text, a short list of the three to five fixes that will move the needle, and practical next steps so you know whether to rebuild structure first or polish prose later.

How should I prepare my manuscript and brief before submitting?

Send a clean, readable draft and a concise brief that names your genre and target reader, two or three comparable titles, what you think works and what you worry about. Include your intended publishing route and realistic timeline so the editor can tailor their advice.

Remove placeholder notes, fix obvious name inconsistencies, and state whether you want the editor to focus on opening pages, the middle, or the whole manuscript. A good brief improves how focused and useful the assessment will be.

How do I use the editorial report to revise without spiralling?

Read the report once without taking notes, then read it again and build a revision checklist with three tiers: must fix, should fix, nice to fix. Prioritise root problems that cause other issues and tackle structure before style or line‑level edits.

Create a scene list and test changes in a new draft file rather than patching individual scenes. This keeps revisions coherent and prevents wasting time polishing sections you later remove.

What affects the cost and what are affordable alternatives?

Cost is driven by manuscript length, turnaround time, editor experience and the depth of analysis. A short, high‑impact report costs less than a scene‑by‑scene breakdown with a call. Fast slots and senior editors command premiums.

If cost is a concern, consider alternatives such as structured beta readers, a paid sample critique of the first 10–30 pages, or a focused critique on your outline or first three chapters. These options can give useful direction before committing to a full assessment.

How do I spot a weak or unsuitable manuscript assessment service?

Red flags include generic template reports with no specific examples from your manuscript, a long undifferentiated list of minor issues, no clear priorities or revision plan, and editors who refuse to share a sample or explain their deliverables. Beware of promises of guaranteed publication or overnight transformations.

Ask for a sample report or a short paid sample edit to check fit. A strong assessor will show close engagement with your text, prioritise a handful of fixes, and offer a follow‑up option so you can clarify recommendations without extra drama.

Writing Manual Cover

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent
Get free book